thatmom

real encouragement for real homeschooling moms

september 7 podcast

Podcast Logo My issue with the “patriarchy” movement is not with the TRUE Biblical teachings of fathers’ roles in their homes, but with their new “enlightened” or “presuppositional” view that is being taught and promoted today….When the average conservative person hears the word “feminist” he thinks of a bra-burning, baby-aborting Jezebel screaming for equal rights. Labeling someone a feminist who disagrees with what the patriocentrists now assume are “presuppositional” truths, paints a picture that will guarantee the sought after reaction….discerning Christians will recognize this for what it is and nothing more, extravagant claims made to incite the audience.” Listen here for this weeks podcast entitled “Thatmom’s History of Patriarchy in the Homeschooling Community.”

62 Comments »

  thatmom wrote @

This podcast was uploaded all of 10 minutes when I learned that Doug Phillips had changed his wording on his blog to read “anti-complimentarian” rather than “complementarian.” That being said, it really doesn’t matter because the teachings of patriarchy he espouses are NOT complementarian anyway.

  Jen wrote @

Wow! Their response is getting really quick these days. They must not have much to do other than keep on top of our blogs!

You are correct that Doug has never been complementarian. I just hope he doesn’t try to corrupt that term now.

OK. I’m off to listen to your podcast! Keep up the good work!

  re4mdmom wrote @

Okay, this was a FANTASTIC podcast! I admire the work you’ve put in. You’ve obviously done your research. I admire the courage it took to actually name names! Its about time, don’t you think?

This was absolutely wonderful and I can’t wait for the next installment.

  Shauna wrote @

Great podcast! I’m looking forward to the rest of the series.

  Light wrote @

Great podcast, Karen. It was nice to put a voice with your face, too. You mentioned the double standard for women like Elisabeth Elliott and Phyllis Shlafly in patriocentric circles. I’d add Mrs. Paige Patterson to that. Paige Patterson makes no secret of his belief that women belong in the home, period … yet his wife, Dorothy, is paid a salary to work outside the home and teach a homemaking course to women at Southwestern Baptist Thelogical Seminary. I guess if you tickle these patriachalists’ ears and say what they want to hear, you get a free pass no matter what your actions are.

  WindsweptPlains wrote @

Thank you, Karen. You did an excellent job of articulating the issues many of us have with patriarchy. I wish I could have heard this two years ago!

Will you be addressing “Where do we go from here?” type questions at the end of your series? As in how we might help bring about a more balanced perspective into the homeschooling community? Or is that not a realistic goal at this point since the patriarchy position is so polarizing?

Looking forward to the rest of your series of podcasts!

  joanna wrote @

I’ve been looking forward to this first installment since I first heard about it. I just listened-it was the first podcast I’ve ever heard. Very well done.
I’m thankful that you have the courage, as someone else mentioned above, to name names. We need to hear who these people are and what they’re saying. I’ve been extricating myself from these teachings for awhile now, but podcasts like this only prove what I was feeling in my gut-that this stuff isn’t what biblical Christianity is all about after all.
Thank you for the time you spent doing this. I look forward to next Friday. :)

  sarah wrote @

Excellent work Karen. A much needed analysis from a woman who takes her Bible and her family seriously.

  Corrie wrote @

Karen,

Thank you for taking on this project. We need more people like you who are willing to spend the time and who are willing to put their necks on the chopping block in order to break the silence. I have had many women whisper to me at these homeschooling conferences, asking me if I find some of this stuff a little “extreme”. There are people who need to know they are not alone. It is not the world thatis blinding us but it is scripture which doesn’t allow us to use it for our own agendas.

  jb wrote @

Fascinating podcast. I’ve been away from the homeschooling movement for many years and if the truth be told, my wife did the homeschooling. She had the gift of teaching children; I did not.

I do believe Biblical patriarchy disappeared in the last 3 or 4 decades and it’s re-appearance is probably a response to the feminist agenda.

But there’s always a tension; patriarchy is easily manipulated by those who are, at heart, “control freaks.” It can be, and is, corrupted by those who wish to rule versus wish to be what God calls them to be.

I believe I’ve been less patriarchal than I should have been but I’ve also always been to lazy to be a control freak. (I do think you should ALWAYS park facing outward from a parking space however. My family long ago sickened of my standard and NONE of them do anything other than pull into a parking space head first. sigh)

Finally, in May my daughter graduated from a secular university and decided, against what I and my wife thought was wisest, to remain where she is living in an apartment with her girlfriend – who’s about to get married. For monetary reasons and for reasons of safety and security I wish she was living at home but her will in this matter is more determined than mine. So she remains.

God will surely hold me accountable where I have failed as spiritual leader of the family. But the family too will answer to God for their failures.

Patriarchy I find to be an uncomfortable, but God given, burden.

  Light wrote @

Jb, I would ask you to consider that perhaps patriarchy is not God-given, but rather a sinful result of the fall. (See Gen 3:16) God gave you a wife (ezer, helper, same word as used for God 20-some times in the OT), to share your burden, not make it bigger.

  A Gracious Home » Patriarchy podcast series has started wrote @

[...] at thatmom.com has uploaded the first podcast in her patriarchy series. She also recently announced that there would be podcasts in September AND October to get through [...]

  jb wrote @

A conservative reading of Genesis pretty clearly establishes patriarchy before the fall.

Also to be considered; within the Trinity there are roles; Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

I think the question is; what kind of patriarch will a man be? Wise or foolish.

SIDENOTE: Wayne Grudem, pre-eminent conservative theologian and complimentarian, left a top tier seminary for a secondary tier seminary because it was best for his wife’s health. I think that is proper patriarchy.

  Patriarchy Podcast « Treasure Seekers wrote @

[...] Shauna Categories: podcasts and issues I listened to the first in a series of podcasts at Thatmom, in which Karen discusses the uber-patriarchy or “patriocentric” movement, [...]

  Carol wrote @

I just found your site last night. Thank you so much for taking the time and effort to encourage homeschooling families. I look forward to listening to more of your podcasts. :)

  Julie wrote @

Finally got a chance to listen to this. THANK YOU. Again, I really think this is a reaction against the culture at large.

I’ve stopped receiving Vision Forum material. Since I homeschool in Colorado, I still receive the Christian Home Educators of Colorado magazine, but I’m thinking of cancelling it.

Honestly, the patriarchy movement makes me depressed and feel like a failure. I submit to my husband, I want him to lead, but I also want to educate my daughter and teach my sons that the world does not revolve around them just because they are men. So much of patriarchy reminds me of radical Islam and their treatment of women.

  thatmom wrote @

Light,

I have a list a mile long of the examples of this sort of hypocrisy. What does this do to the wives who are working outside the home when their husbands support these teachings, either directly or by saying nothing when their peers do so?

Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

  thatmom wrote @

Jennifer on the WindsweptPlains,

First of all, I live on the prairie of Illinois so I totally understand your blog name!

So, about solutions to this problem…I hope that if enough people brainstorm together and share their information that we can come up with some real ideas on how to counter act the extreme teachings in this movement.

One of the reasons I am so concerned is that there are already people outside the homeschooling community who are examining these gender-weird teachings. One research paper that was written and published at a state law school was calling for more local and state controls on homeschooling because the author thinks that some homeschools violate equal rights under the constitution. We need to police our own community for our own protection.

I know one thing that I have done is to more carefully examine the materials I see at homeschooling conventions. I also have voiced my opinion to our local leadership and I won’t attend a conference if they bring in any of those speakers who promote this sort of agenda.

Another thing is for each family to do their own research and Bible studies using the Scripture that is passed off as “patriarchial.” The church, in general, needs a great Berean spirit about many things, not just this subject. But becoming discerning and looking at God’s word and understanding what it is teaching rather than having a preconceived idea and trying to find verses to support it is the proper way to study the Bible. I would love to hear what others are thinking along these lines.

  thatmom wrote @

JB,

I appreciate your candid thoughts here.

I would encourage you to scroll back through my blog and read the entries addressing the one anothers of Scripture and also to listen to the two podcasts that talk about one anothering parenting. If you approach your grown daughter in the same way you would approach any other believer, perhaps she will be more open in her relationship with you. I really believe that the more I study these principles in Scripture, the more convicted I have become about the way I address not only others outside my own home, but my family as we one another each other.

  thatmom wrote @

Carol,

Thanks for stopping by and welcome to my blog. I took a brief glance at your spot of the cyber world and can’t wait to go back for another browse.

I am just curious, but how prevalent are the patriocentric teachings in Canada? I know I chatted with a woman from the UK who said that she hadn’t seen them in quite the same way as we are in the homeschooling world here. What are the similarities and what are the differences you are seeing?

  thatmom wrote @

To everyone else, thanks for the kind words. I am excited from my end because I know the great stuff that is still coming.

  Cindy Kunsman wrote @

Great job, Karen! I’m waiting with great anticipation to hear the rest of the presentations.

I think it is worth noting, based on a comment or two here, that no one is challenging submission of a wife to her husband, the blessings of moms staying at home to minister to their families or the blessings of godly husbands and fathers. It is the rigid and narrow interpretation of acceptable Christian behavior on behalf of those who claim that their definition and standards of what they have termed “Biblical Patriarchy” as the only acceptable standard of faithful Christian conduct.

For questioning or criticizing interpretations of certain Scriptures (say for instance, those who challenge Grudem’s concept of God as inseparable from that of gender roles and relationships), many conservative, God-fearing and loving devoted Christians are deemed “feminists” and nefarious enemies within the Christian camp. Rather than esteem those who exercize their Christian liberty in a different manner in Christian love and respect from those different members of the body of Christ, so many of the “patriarchs” level insults and inapplicable descriptors. Their standards are prescribed by many as a non-optional cure for the disease of sin and secular culture with equal significance to that of the Scriptures. It is the sarcedotalism of these self-established authorities that many here question, not loving conduct in marriage and family or the celebration of the blessings of children.

  Shauna wrote @

I also have voiced my opinion to our local leadership and I won’t attend a conference if they bring in any of those speakers who promote this sort of agenda.

One of the men you mentioned in the podcast is the Executive Director of my state’s Christian home education organization, which hosts Colorado’s annual convention and has a significant influence on Christian homeschoolers in the state in general. I’m pretty sure that all of the individuals mentioned in your podcast have been featured speakers at the CHEC conference at one time or another, and their products and books are well represented in the vendor hall. I look forward to the continued discussion and hearing others’ ideas about how to address this trend–preferably without being viewed as a Jezebel just trying to cause division!

  thatmom wrote @

Cindy, great comments and insight. As I pointed out in the podcast, it isn’t us ordinary folks who have moved way, way down the continuum. It is the patriocentrists who have moved and appear to be moving even further away from normal.

  thatmom wrote @

Shauna,

Not long ago we counted at least 30 state conventions that featured patriocentric teachers and leaders keynoting conventions around the country this year. This is why I am so concerned. Too many people are hearing these teachings and, especially beginning homeschoolers, might think these views are as necessary as math and phonics. I also know that some speakers you and I would think are terrific and normal in their approach to family life have been blackballed and even told that they aren’t good examples of godly homeschoolers because they sent daughters to college.

I also think that because so many products are now purchased online, the appeal of the vendor hall is waning. This means that those who schedule speakers for their conferences had better be paying even closer attention to who comes to the podium because we can always shop at our favorite non-patriarch websites and skip paying the big attender fees to be told that the “grand sweep of revelation” requires obedience to patriocentric agendas.

  joanna wrote @

I hope these get named on your podcasts. I don’t only want to know who NOT to support, but who TO support! :)

  joanna wrote @

Ah, my cut and paste didn’t go thru! I’d like to know the names of the speakers who have been
blackballed so I know who to support.

  Carol wrote @

Re: Canada
(Thanks for the warm welcome.)

I am in eastern Canada and homeschooling itself is not overly common. Our problem tends to be more the opposite – almost all children are in public schools and the mothers are working. The west is more into homeschooling and they seem more likely to embrace the patriarchal movement (and influence others).

  thatmom wrote @

Joanna,

Here is one example. One woman spent decades ministering to homeschoolers as a leader in her state. When her last child was grown, she began her own business from her kitchen table and also sent her daughter to college. Up until then, she was a well-respected speaker. After that, she was told that her family no longer represented a godly homeschooling model because of these two life choices. Since her business was not homeschooling related, she dropped out of the picture and quietly encourages homeschooling moms from behind the scenes.

Though I haven’t heard the tape of her presentation, several people told me that Diana Waring gave an awesome keynote address at a convention this past spring and talked about schooling your children outside of the “box.” I have heard wonderful reviews of her presentation, many people saying it was so refreshing to hear rather than the typical stuff that is being peddled. She also seems to emphasize the building of relationships with your children and that is the key to homeschooling successfully so she is one person I intend to support. I would love to hear from others who have some thoughts or experience on this topic.

  thatmom wrote @

Carol,

What do you think makes the difference geographically? Since I live in the midwestern US and have grown children on both coasts, my observation is that most trends, whether they are in the secular culture or the evangelical world, seem to begin on either coast and move to the center of the country last. This is also one reason it is interesting for me to read and listen to people not where I live, then I can see what is coming here!

  Carol wrote @

Re: geography
I agree. I think it goes back to the different kinds of people who immigrated to North America in the first place – and the differences in Americans and Canadians. In Canada itself, the more pioneer-type people traveled west. The people in Eastern Canada seem to be more trusting and perhaps naive.

  Annie wrote @

Karen,

Thank you for taking the time and effort to do this. It was very well presented, articulate and in fact I think I might listen to it once more! To me, it is just amazing that some people would twist scripture so much to promote their own agenda and make it an either-or tactics. Either you are a home staying-mother of ten working for your husbands vision OR you are a college going feminist with 3 abortions to your name.

This offends and saddens me. Once again let me say, Great Job!! Looking forward to next week’s episode.

  thatmom wrote @

Carol, This is interesting. I feel like I know little about my northern neighbors and am so happy you are joining the discussion here. Too often, i think American Christians (are Canadian Christians like this, too?) tend to Americanize everything and think that because it is American iit equals Biblical. I know that is simplifying something far more complex, but I think you know what I mean. yes, I believe the Scripture applies to all people in all times and places, but we have to be careful not to superimpose any colloquial prejudices on others. Do you see this in your country?

in general, the patriocentric lifestyles are southern in nature, not universally American. I spent several weeks in the south with my daughter several years ago when her first baby was born and it was like being in another country. (I had never seen so many Vera Bradley handbags in my life!) What was considered to feminine and ladylike was different than what we Yankees would expect. The patriocoentrists are enamored with the era of the pre-Civil War southern culture, and have established the old rules for women as the standard for women in the 21st century, insisting that it is “biblical” womanhood.

These are just some random thoughts….any southern ladies out there care to disagree with me? It is just what I have observed.

  thatmom wrote @

Annie,

Thanks for joining the discussion. You have brought up one of the most important points, that of the one-size-fits-all mentality. And you are correct, it IS offensive. I know many, many lovely young women who have gone to college, have graduated, and are examples of godly femininity. Doing so does not equal belittling women who make other choices.

No one I know has insisted that women must go to college. However, I do believe there are many, many benefits for someone to study at the college level and I disagree that reading lots of books with your dad is the same thing. However, if that is the choice of individuals, i would never in a million years suggest that they are outside of God’s will or that they will make horrendous choices. I have long asked why it has to be either or and have never been given a straight answer, only a “feminist” label hurled my direction.

  Lindsey @ enjoythejourney wrote @

NCHE (North Carolinians for Home Education) would be one of those 30 I’d imagine.

DP and VF were the keynote speakers 3 years ago I think…however….they showed themselves so badly and made so many people angry, I doubt they’ll ever be invited back to speak. They still have a booth, but I don’t think will ever get an invite to speak again. (and this info came to me thru someone in the know and serving in the NCHE leadership!)

  thatmom wrote @

Lindsay said: “they showed themselves so badly and made so many people angry, I doubt they’ll ever be invited back to speak.”

Can you explain what happened? What made people angry?

  thatmom wrote @

Joanna,

I also want to heartily endorse Clay and Sallie Clarkson and Whole Heart Ministries. I haven’t heard them speak but their books are great and are a breath of fresh air.

  joanna wrote @

Yes, I love Sally Clarkson’s books.
I also would like to know how DP showed badly. I hope Lindsey checks back here and tells us more!
And I agree with you-I do think the Patrios like the idea of pre-civil war southern women. I have observed this as well.
Can’t wait till Friday!

  Carol wrote @

Our radical liberal (government-funded) media has done a fine job painting the US in a bad light. And people believe it, even though their lifestyles are “American”.

I almost said in my last comment that the patriarchal movement is coming from the south.

In my area, religion is not taken to the “cultish” extent that it is in the south and other areas.

  Lindsey @ enjoythejourney wrote @

Hey y’all…only got a second but I’ll do my best to explain it in a nutshell.

Basically, when Dougie and his clan showed up at NCHE as the keynotes that year, they did the hyperpatriarchy stuff just as they’re doing now.

Yes, *some* homeschoolers are into that, but some homeschoolers are NOT either. He greatly offended some Catholic homeschooling friends of mine with his comments about Catholics (not saved, will go to h*ll, same ole stuff DP and many conservative preachers spout off at the mouth, especially in the south)

Besides the Catholic homeschoolers, he put off other people by his souped up standards. He was quite into the “visionary leader” thing then and his League of Grateful Sons movie had just come out. It was all about “women and children first” and how men were the protectors of their women. Which, is a good thing unless you put a negative spin on it.

Anyhow, so many people complained to the NCHE staff and board, that I was told he would never be invited back again as a speaker. He has still sent a booth and people to staff it the past 2 years, but he has not had workshop/speaking invites anymore, and I doubt he ever will.

Word is spreading quick about his activities and cult-like thoughts and theology. I think as one commenter said here or somewhere else (sorry, I read alot!) we as the homeschool community have begun policing our own so to speak—I certainly do NOT want Doug Phillips or VF being the mouthpiece that represents who I am, why I homeschool, and so on.

So that is it in a nutshell. Over the top theology and Catholic bashing.

  WindsweptPlains wrote @

Does anyone know if David Quine is one of those “blacklisted” speakers? I had enjoyed his emphasis on becoming “by faith families” in his talks. However, this past year he didn’t even had a booth at the Colorado convention (that I am aware of). When I mentioned this to a friend who is influential in deciding on the speakers for her state convention (not Colorado), she replied that they wouldn’t ask him to come since he has written some curriculum that “caused a friend’s children to turn away from God”. She wouldn’t give any other explanations, so I guess I have missed something over the years. I remember him as being a gentle, Godly, encouraging homeschooling father.

I had enjoyed Diana Waring, too, but I don’t remember seeing her the past few conventions, either.

I read on another blog that some states have smaller homeschooling conventions that are run by more “moderate” (not patriarchal) homeschoolers. I think I’ll be looking around for something like that next summer!

By the way, when I received the Colorado CHEC news magazine recently, it said that Doug Phillips was to be the featured speaker for the convention next year.

  WindsweptPlains wrote @

Previous statement should read: “it said that Doug Phillips was to be a featured speaker”… I don’t recall if he was to be the main speaker.

  Elizabeth wrote @

I am looking forward to the next podcast- this last one was excellent.

One thing that strikes me as I ponder this patriocentric movement is that there is a certain mean-spirited aspect to it– at least towards anyone who differs from the patriocentric “norm.”
I saw a Jennie Chauncey clip on the “Visionary Daughters” site in which she dismisses all daycare workers as “brainless”. Whatever one’s view on daycare, I think that all reasonable people can agree that 1) not all daycare workers are “brainless” (full disclosure: my sister works in a preschool and is both very smart, creative and dedicated to her young charges) and 2) it is just plain hateful and demeaning to call a group of people “brainless.” By her namecalling, she has arrogantly proclaimed that she believes they have some subhuman status. Is it not possible for her to express her anti-daycare views without the nastiness? It strikes me as profoundly un-Christian, and yet, this type of namecalling and denigration of people whose views are not completely in accord with the anointed patriocentrists appears to be common.

  joanna wrote @

Hey, I was a preschool teacher for several years before I got married. Then I had a small daycare in my home for a few years. I do not consider myself to be “brainless”!!!
When I was following those teachings, I felt very inferior to those people. I didn’t dress my girls in homemade look-alike dresses, my dh doesn’t lead us in family devotions, we watch mainstream movies and we own a t.v., we stopped having children after number five came along, (in 6 1/2 years) etc. If a woman is sensitive, they can definitely make you feel like you are a second class Christian if you are not completely in their camp. At least I felt that way.

  Lindsey @ enjoythejourney wrote @

Well, when I was a preschool teacher I walked away most days feeling BRAIN DEAD! :) Two year olds will do that to ya!

(just kidding…)

I say that to agree wholeheartedly with the name calling. It is ugly and unkind. They won’t use flat out curse words, but terms like harlot, jezebel, abortion-loving-feminists, brainless, etc are just as bad, if not worse if you ask me.

It is like the “christian” equivalent of slander. Since we as Christians aren’t supposed to engage in such things, we make it look more lovely by using words like jezebel found in the Bible.

  thatmom wrote @

Lindsay,

Thanks for sharing the info about the NCHE situation. Where Iive there are quite a few Catholic homeschoolers but they prefer to have their own conferences, speakers, and curriculum fairs so that has never been an issue that I know of.

Have any of you ever heard of there being problems with having a woman as a keynote speaker for a homeschooling conference? I have heard of this and I know there are some people in these camps who believe women should never teach men, even outside the church setting. I have even heard of there being a problem with a woman praying in public at a homeschooling conference. just curious if anyone else has heard of this.

  thatmom wrote @

While I thought Jennie’s comments were really obnoxious, it reminded me of something amusing that I saw a few years ago. I shared this story on one of the podcasts but will tell it again because it fits this topic.

My friend who worked for a family service ministry called me to tell me that she had seen a list of qualifications for a child to attend all day pre-school for free and she thought of me because my children, according to the official list, would be considered to be “at risk.” Included on the list: a mother is a stay-at-home mom and there are 3 or more siblings. Yep, that would be us.

I then had to laugh. You see, every single morning at 7:30 am, my neighbor who had 4 pre-schoolers would put two of her children on the Head Start bus and they would be gone for the day since they were considered “at risk.” At 7:45 am, while standing at the end of her sidewalk with a baby on her hip and a toddler at her feet, three mini-vans would pull up and each of those moms would drop off one child for my neighbor to babysit.

Those three little ones were not “at risk”
because their moms worked all day and they were only children. But they spent 10 hours with a woman whose own children were “at risk.”

My tax dollars at work.

  thatmom wrote @

Joanna,

Your comments reminded me of something I read one day on a brochure advertising an Amish community near us.

The story was told of an older Amish couple who got into their buggy after church one Sunday and as they drove away, the wife turned to her husband and said “Honey, I do believe we were the plainest there today.”

The Bible tells us that “to compare ourselves among ourselves is not wise.” But we do it all the time. And in homeschooling circles, I think this is an easy trap to fall into because we all want the affirmation that we are doing a good job, that our children will turn out normal, and that we are accepted by other homeschoolers. I have seen more competition among homeschoolers that I have ever seen among the public school people I know. (except for maybe that cheerleader in Texas whose mom tried to kill the other cheerleader…gotta watch out for those cheerleaders.)

And sometimes the criticism leveled against homeschoolers by other homeschoolers is terrible. For example, I have known people who are very intense homeschoolers who are critical of unschoolers. My opinion is that each of us know our own children and their gifts, abilities, propensities, etc. We need to not have so many opinions of others, in my opinion!

  sarah wrote @

“Have any of you ever heard of there being problems with having a woman as a keynote speaker for a homeschooling conference? I have heard of this and I know there are some people in these camps who believe women should never teach men, even outside the church setting. I have even heard of there being a problem with a woman praying in public at a homeschooling conference. just curious if anyone else has heard of this.”

I’ve spoken at several home school events in the past. Almost every time, I had someone come up and rebuke or condemn me because I was a “young woman” teaching others. All I was doing, usually, was talking about life as a home school grad and the choices available to you (egads, maybe higher education). One group even got a complaint about me because I characterized one school of thought as saying girls should stay home and knit (it was in jest, too, but some people see persecution around every corner).

On the other side of the coin, I also would have people tell me that they were glad to see motivate young women and appreciated that I was willing to speak. Once, I even had a gentleman tell me that he was very upset when he saw that I was a young woman giving a workshop, but after listening to it, he changed his mind because I had good things to say and was theologically grounded.

  Amy wrote @

I’m not even sure how I ended up here, but I look forward to listening to the podcasts as time permits. I just wanted to make two comments and hope neither stir the pot.

First, Diana Waring is awesome! I have heard her at a few different conferences (we are sort of groupies) and have always been encouraged and inspired by her speaking and her materials. She is deep waters.

Second, from what I have read thus far here, and elsewhere, on this subject I would offer the caution of watching the line between critique and attack. As Christians we are already warned to “study to show ourselves approved unto God” and to “search the Scriptures”. Many of those who have been “named” have some things that are good, but they are just men and we need to remember, that we are accountable to God for our actions and beliefs, not to (a) man. My husband often says, “Take what is good and leave the rest.” Such should be our approach to all man’s teachings, even on Scripture.

  Cheryl at MM Outreach wrote @

Wonderful podcast! I applaud you in your effort to test all things by God’s word!

  Mary wrote @

I cannot tell you here how much this movement has affected me and hurt me. I cannot put it all down here right now. I am so glad that someone has been so bold as to come out and say this. We have to be concerned when so many act as if they have the corner on what the bible says about raising our families. I do agree that I was originally drawn to it out of the desire to create a perfect paradigm for my family. Can you give me tips on addressing this on my blog to help spread the message. I have almost been afraid to do so, because others may misunderstand and think I am feminist and do not hold traditional views for the home. Thanks for doing this. I hope you will put the completed podcast out on CD.

  thatmom wrote @

Cheryl,

Thanks for your kind words and welcome to my blog.

  thatmom wrote @

Mary,

I am so happy that you stopped by to share with us about your life. I will be praying for you, that the Lord will bring healing where it is needed.

Perhaps the best way for you to share with people who come to your blog is to tell them your own story. People might call names and criticize but your own story is your own story and no one can take that away from you.

Also, encourage your friends to look at what the Scriptures teach. There are a couple aspects of this movement that I still want to research further because I think they will be helpful in understanding the teachings. You can do the same. And as you see more and more things in the light of Scripture and you share these things, others will have their eyes opened.

You can also suggest that your friends listen to these podcasts and give them the link. I welcome discussion here and if there are dissenters, I am happy to have them as well. As I said earlier, I would welcome genuine discussion on these issues.

  Greg Anderson wrote @

Karen, How did the body of Christ get so far from the essentials? Is it an innate desire in much of humankind to want to control and rule over others? I am convinced that this behavior is an historical pattern and definitely cyclic. I am sooo glad that you, Cheryl Schatz and others are shining the floodlight of Scripture on patriocentrism, hierarchalism, and other aberrant ideologies which have no sound doctrinal basis whatsoever. We have infallible truth in God’s word as revealed in the original autographs and languages. What we do not have however is inerrant translation or interpretation on issues aside from faith in Christ and Christ alone. Keep the podcasts going and exposing aberrant teachings for what they are!
Greg Anderson

  concerned wrote @

This movement of uberpatriarchy (my favorite term) is creeping into churches. It is very dangerous and legalistic. It also causes people to be very judgmental and pharisaical. I was given a lengthy letter by a lady in my church detailing how my choice to not have more children was the equivalent of committing adultery against my husband. I was condemned and cornered; labeled a sinner and urged to repent and change. As if this isn’t bad enough, I am a wife of one of the pastors. This woman did not take her issues up with our elders (since our church definitely doesn’t buy this stuff), nor did she seek out older, godly women to teach her, instead she turned to the internet. Once convinced (not by our church’s teaching or by the confessions our church stands by, but by some internet sites) she bombarded me and hurt me with all this legalism. I truly believe that in this day and age bizarre theologies can spread over the internet fast and furious–with no guidance from ministers, elders, older women, or even husbands! We ought to caution young women against becoming absorbed in cyber-theology — where one can create contacts, chat rooms, blogs, websites, discussions, and in essence electronic families and internet churches that usurp the tangible, real, flesh-and-blood relationships that ought to be primary.

Whew, that was a mouthful, sorry! :)

- Concerned in Southern California

  thatmom wrote @

Amy,

Sorry, I missed your comment and wanted to respond!

I appreciate your caution and your admonition to be careful of the manner in which we approach these teachings and the teachers.

I would agree that those within the patriarchal camps do have some good things to say and to offer. (I even have many of their books on my shelves.) And, as others here have said so eloquently, that is precisely what makes them so dangerous. I know from my own experience how easy it is to get drawn into the entire system once you begin listening to their teachings and buying their products. It’s a funny thing, too, but if you have financially invested in a product, there is a part of you that is really reluctant to admit that you might have been wrong or spent your money unwisely so you continue to use it or even promote it so you will feel better yourself.
I also believe that our example for addressing these things must be Jesus….He was tenderhearted and gentle and patient with those who struggled under the weight of their burdens. And so we should be with those who are struggling in their homes as they put these teachings into practice.

But Jesus’ harshest words all throughout the Gospels were for those who would place heavy burdens on the backs of others and would not even follow their own teachings (hypocrisy). Both of these are characteristic of those within patriocentric circles.

Also, you stated that we must be careful to differentiate between attacking and critiquing the teachings, views, and/or writings of others. I guess my “line of demarcation” would be this: we need to be careful to not attack the person of another, making slanderous remarks or comments about them on a personal level. On the other hand, I believe that what people write on blogs, in articles or essays, or, especially, in books that the sell in the marketplace, are open to critique. I especially think that last one is important. If someone makes a lot of money keynoting homeschooling conventions or selling books, then extra scrutiny ought to occur. And if there are teachings that are taught as “the biblical way” or “as presuppositional” when they are merely man’s agenda, then truth demands that we do attack those teachings

  thatmom wrote @

Concerned,

Thanks so much for sharing your personal story here.

The internet can be used for so many wonderful things, including the study of theology. By husband and I have really enjoyed researching and sharing with each other the many things we have read and learned.

But, as with all study of theology, we need to be discerning. We need to look at where those teachings are coming from, who is promoting them, hold them up to both the Word of God and the historic creeds. And you are correct that we need to look at those things in the light of what we are hearing preached in our own church. Of course, that means you have to be in a solid, Bible-teaching church to begin with! :0

By the way, {{{{{{}}}}} to you. What happened with the lady in your church is outrageous!

  Shauna wrote @

“I saw a Jennie Chauncey clip on the “Visionary Daughters” site in which she dismisses all daycare workers as “brainless”.

I just watched this clip today, and I didn’t get this impression from what she said. She said that when a woman says she wants to stay home and raise her family, the reaction is often, “Oh, anyone can do that! What a waste of brainpower! Just send them to daycare.” She wasn’t saying that she thinks daycare workers are brainless but rather that this is the logical conclusion if you’re going to make the claim that raising kids doesn’t require much brainpower.

  Marg wrote @

Wow! And…. WOW!!!

Thank you for this information.

My hubby and I attended APACHE in Illinois a few years back (or longer) and listened to DP. I was looking at my husband and wrote a note to him saying, “what is this guy’s deal?” It was just odd and left me feeling…. odd.

Someone shared: “I also know that some speakers you and I would think are terrific and normal in their approach to family life have been blackballed and even told that they aren’t good examples of godly homeschoolers because they sent daughters to college.”

That is so sad. What horrible discrimination and it’s ridiculous.

I’m a mother to three daughters.

My husband and I are most definitely encouraging college. Do they “have” to have a college education? No. Still… I encourage them to have a degree.

I am a registered nurse and BSN and work per diem. It’s fabulous! I can be a nurse and MINISTER to others and be wife, mom and homeschool teacher. My husband is supportive and helpful is the reason this works for us.

Looking forward to listening more!

  october 26 podcast « thatmom wrote @

[...] if you are just now joining me for these podcasts, I would suggest that you go back to the Introduction to Patriocentricity podcast from September 7th and begin there. You can also find the podcast archives at [...]

[...] Patriarchy and complemenatianism as a “plumb line” for determining that which is truly Christian (and other views as less or possibly sub-Christian) Commonly held belief [...]


Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>