thatmom

real encouragement for real homeschooling moms

raising homeschooled daughters, part three

The Incredible Worth of a Daughter

Every June my town hosts what is absolutely one of my favorite annual events…Gabby Days. It begins with city-wide garage sales, dozens of them. As if that isn’t wonderful enough, for a junk junkie like me, a week or so later, the city sends around huge garbage trucks to collect anything from the corners of their homes and garages that people want to get rid of. And that is when the real fun begins.

Some of my very best treasures have come from the scrap piles that I have gone through. And always the question I ask is “why would anyone throw this away?” Vintage linens, handmade quilts, flower pots, antique jars, and furniture of all kinds have found new homes in my house. This year I pulled a solid oak desk from someone’s trash and it will be a wonderful addition to my son’s room when it is sanded down and repainted. Though it was hard for those who drove right past it to see, on its inside, my desk is a wonderful treasure.

Sometimes when I look at the young girls who work in our local fast food restaurants or who spend their Saturdays shopping in the mall, I wonder if those around them can see the amazing treasures that they really are. Underneath the silly t-shirts, stylish jeans, and flip-flops, they are women-in-the-making and many of them do not even realize it themselves. They are caught somewhere between being little girls with fairy princess dreams and grown women who must live in reality rather than an ivy covered castle.

To many of them, their value as young women is based on the standards established by the world around them. They are girls in the sense that society tells them they are. Their lives express what it means to be feminine by following the definition of the week for what that means.
The problem is that they are being sent a message that narrowly defines what it means to be a girl or a woman and all of those messages are based on their physical attributes. Feminine is described, both in the secular culture and within conservative Christian circles, in terms of gender specific expectations.

But godly womanhood begins with recognizing that we are to love one another, as Joni Eareckson has said, “simply for the preciousness of their souls.” And that, I believe, is one of the greatest challenges for homeschooling moms as they raise daughters. We must concentrate on those attributes of godliness in their lives that reflect that they are unique creations, image bearers of the living God, a part of His royal priesthood.

Here are two of the reasons that I believe this is important:

Not all daughters will naturally be drawn to what either secular culture or conservative Christian culture deems to be “feminine” nor should they have to be.

In fact, as we concentrate on the spiritual aspects of our daughters’ lives, we may begin to ask the very question that apologist Ravi Zacharius posed when he asked “If you strip off the flesh are our souls essentially different? Are we masculine and feminine on the soul level?” And that leads us to ask for definitions for the words “masculine” and “feminine” which is nearly impossible to do!

I remember reading the story of Betty Greene, the founder of Missionary Aviation Fellowship and one of the first women test pilots during World War II. As her high school years came to a close, her parents encouraged her to study nursing since the common belief at that time was that women are natural nurturers and, therefore, ought to pursue the fields of education and nursing.

So Betty reluctantly attended nursing school even though her heart was drawn to airplanes and flying. Eventually her parents agreed that she could follow her dreams and it led to the founding of a worldwide ministry that today enables the work of over 800 missions organizations! God’s calling on the life of Betty Greene is an incredible example of one of God’s image bearers reflecting Him through His calling on her life, though it didn’t resemble what many people might call “feminine.”

Another concern I have in this area is that inadvertently, many people can be setting their children up for homosexual temptation by defining what is for girls and what is for boys according to their own personal preferences.

Christians who have repented and come out of homosexual lifestyles will often tell you that, when growing up, they were more interested in the hobbies and activities of what the culture said belonged to the opposite sex. They often had parents or teachers who conveyed their disapproval about those interests, pushing them into areas they genuinely disliked. They heard phrases like “Boys don’t play with dolls.” or “Boys don’t arrange flowers.” Girls often heard “Those sports are for boys” or “Put on this dress so you can look like a girl.” *

Instead of turning away from their natural interests or preferences, they were left confused and became vulnerable during their teen and young adult years when someone suggested that their interests showed that they “might be gay,” leading them into a lifestyle they never wanted or were even attracted to in the first place.

Rather than wringing our hands over any gay marriage bill (which, of course, I do not support) we ought to be examining the teachings in our own homes that might send a message to our children that they can’t be girls because they like sports or boys because they like dolls. And rather than pushing our own strident and unbiblically supported views of gender, we should accept and encourage the differences each child has.

Secondly, a daughter’s value as a woman is based solely on what God has already done not on anything she will ever do or not do.

We hear much talk today within homeschooling circles about “militant fecundity,” ie a daughter beginning her child bearing early in life and pursuing the goal of having as many children as possible. While I would be the first to encourage families to see all their children as gifts from the Lord, exploiting the gift of motherhood by describing it in militant terms is, frankly, appalling to me. (Note: major thread about this topic coming up in near future.)

How much worse could it be for a daughter who is taught that this is her “natural use” and that “she will be saved in childbearing” (1 Timothy 2:15) actually means that her eternal standing before Christ is literally based on whether or not she gives birth? We would do well to have each of our daughters memorize “Not by works of righteousness which we have done but according to His mercy He saved us” (Titus 3:5) and that bearing and raising children is a reflection of the work God has already done in our own lives when He brought us to Christ. (In Isaiah 42 God describes himself as laboring and delivering His children, breast-feeding us, and nurturing us on his knees!)

How important it is to confirm to our precious daughters that they are “fearfully and wonderfully made” (Psalm 139), that they are “chosen before the foundations of the world” (Ephesians 1), that they are “lively stones in a spiritual house” 1 Peter 2) and that “they were bought with a price so that they may glorify God in their bodies and in their spirits because they belong to Him.” (1 Corinthians 6)

God has a purpose, a plan, and a calling for our daughters. Let’s help them know that the beginning of their journey with the Lord starts with recognizing how valuable they are to Him!

Next, I will be looking at the choices our daughters have for role models and examining which ones are the best choices.

*I wanted to add an addendum to this post at this point by noting that the Vision Forum toys for children come in both a catalog for girls and a catalog for boys and, sadly, stressing the company’s personal preferences for what should be gender appropriate for children. Everyone knows the boys catalog is the most fun!

25 Comments»

  mrsjoy wrote @

Karen, I am really enjoying this series. I know that Lorelei is only two, but I’ve begun to think about these aspects already.

You have so many great points here, but the one that jumps out at me is this:
Secondly, a daughter’s value as a woman is based solely on what God has already done not on anything she will ever do or not do.

This is so true, even setting the “women shall be saved in childbirth mentality” aside; there are many parents that get caught up in whether or not a child is “performing” to their standards (mine was getting high marks in school) and inadvertently send the message that the girl is not ‘good enough’. It sends a mixed message if out of one side of the mouth we tell them they are “unique, just as God made them” and then out of the other, imply that their worth lies in the grades they made, or how domestic they were. I spent much of my adolescence feeling a total failure because I had “only” a 3.8 GPA- I could not see the forest for the trees because I was so wrapped up in being “good enough” for my parents. It was actually my grandma who sat me down and set me straight, and one of the first things she said was “I don’t care if you fail classes and never graduate- I love you just the way you are, and you mean so much to me!” That blew my mind. And my whole self-concept changed from there.

I seriously doubt that my parents set out to make me feel a failure and not good enough; they simply wanted me to ‘measure up’, which I think every parent feels. But when the performing, the “anything she will ever do, not do” aspect becomes the driving force in a girls relationship with her parents, the focus is lost and sometimes irreparable damage can occur.

I can’t imagine what it must look like for some of these patriocentric girls in the long run.

  thatmom wrote @

“I seriously doubt that my parents set out to make me feel a failure and not good enough; they simply wanted me to ‘measure up’, which I think every parent feels.”

Joy, I think this is especially true in homeschooling, whether it is with girls or boys, because the mom and dad are being measured as parents AND as teachers, too!

Your story about your grandma resonates with me, too, because I think grandmas are so often able to see past the non essentials and can just enjoy children for who they are rather than for what they bring to the party!

  Kathryn wrote @

Thank you so much for writing. I’m not a mom, but I needed to read this article, especially for the first bolded point.

One afternoon in church, a young man came up to me and expressed his displeasure with my shoes. His problem was with the heel height- not that he found a 1 inch heel to be immodest, but that it was “already bad enough” that I, a woman, was so tall, so why make it “worse”?

There have been other remarks and articles which only show me how I don’t meet the speaker’s definition of woman, and it’s lead to a bit of a sore spot. Thank you for the reminder that God didn’t screw up making me and I pray He will use all my skills for His glory.

  Annie C wrote @

How much worse could it be for a daughter who is taught that this is her “natural use” and that “she will be saved in childbearing” (1 Timothy 2:15) actually means that her eternal standing before Christ is literally based on whether or not she gives birth?

What happens if she is taught that as a child, if everyone around her believes that, and then as a teen, well before she could even attempt childbearing, she finds out she’s infertile? As a result of cancer, for example? Does that mean she will never be saved, can never be saved? Does that mean she has sinned somehow, that she is eternally dammed? Or what if, God forbid, it was the result of rape, or abuse? Will she now never be saved because someone else has sinned against her?

I’d love to see an answer to this one.

  Cindy K wrote @

Annie C, I love you!

Not that I don’t love everybody else, but you are especially encouraging to me lately.

  Amy R. wrote @

Karen, I have four sons and no daughters. I am printing these articles of yours anyway, and praying that someday a granddaughter or a daughter in law or a friend will be blessed by them. Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this topic!

  mrsjoy wrote @

I’ve been wondering that myself, Annie…
I don’t see how one could twist out an answer that made sense…

“By grace you have been saved, through faith- and this not from yourselves- is the gift of God, not by works, so that no one can boast.” Eph 2:8 and 9.

I often wonder if the patriocentrics read the same Bible sometimes.

  thatmom wrote @

Kathryn, thanks for sharing that story and thanks for your input. I cringed as I read about the man at church. I do think that so many men, probably most of them, don’t really understand the trauma of growing up as girls and women. This isn’t meant to slam men, just an observation. As one of my sons told me recently, “guys have their own traumas so we don’t really think about yours.” :)

  thatmom wrote @

Annie, your point is well taken. I remember knowing a young woman who had to have a hysterectomy when she was only 15. Her family then got really involved with a patriocentric group and I feared she wouldn’t be considered “marriageable.” As it turned out, she met a wonderful man who loved her deeply and didn’t care how “normative” she was. They are really happy and as far as I know are still involved in the children’s ministry where they met.

  thatmom wrote @

Amy,

I grew up as an only child and really didn’t know much about boys. In fact, when I was expecting my first child, if she had been a boy I might have wanted to trade him in! But then the Lord gave us 5 sons and I love having boys! Somewhere down the road I want to write about raising boys…..it is so much fun but has its own challenges! I will be looking for your insights and wisdom on those posts!

  thatmom wrote @

Cindy, I love you too!!!

  thatmom wrote @

Here is an interesting quote I found in my files today. It is from Doug Phillips’ treatise on homosexuality.

“Because homosexuality is both a judgment and source of judgment, the answer to the moral and legal crime of homosexuality is multi-faceted and must be linked to responsible action within each sphere over which Christ claims His lordship, namely the family, the church and the state: First, the absence of biblical patriarchy leads to male effeminacy which leads to homosexuality. Biblical patriarchy must be re-established within the home. To the extent that families have embraced evolutionary or feminist principles of family life (be that the birth control ethic, the effeminate “career wife” model of household provision, or the Greco-Roman vision for educating children) they must repent and return to the “old paths.”

  Kathryn wrote @

thatmom, I see what your son is saying! I’m recently married, and it is very interesting to learn my husband’s thoughts on being a man (serious and not-so-serious) and hear his comments to the effect of, “Wow, this is more difficult/complicated for women!”

  Cindy K wrote @

Karen quoting Doug Phillips in his Phillip Lancaster redux: First, the absence of biblical patriarchy leads to male effeminacy which leads to homosexuality. Biblical patriarchy must be re-established within the home.

Why then are there so many effeminate men in the patriarchy movement. I’ve never seen so many effeminate men in one place and I’ve worked with male homosexuals who display more masculinity than they do. (Despite the radicals, there are many who keep their sexuality limited to their bedrooms.) I believe more and more that their precious patriarchy actually produces effeminate behavior. I’m embarrassed, both when I meet these people at church and when I hear and see them in media. It’s so overt, and I don’t understand why people don’t see it and call it for what it is.

  Queen of Cheese wrote @

I once browsed through the Vision Forum “boy” and “girl” catalogs, and I noticed the “girl catalog” offers a drawing/art set.

I see some irony in their idea that this is a “girl” product because, interestingly enough, the art world has long been the domain of men.

Look through most art history books (especially those early 20th century and earlier) , and the majority of artists, lauded as “great” are men. It was extremely difficult for women to be published (for example, Beatrix Potter, before she produced her cute children’s books, was an accomplished botanical/scientific artist, but failed to earn recognition for such because she was female). It was also unheard of for women to attend art schools (one reason being it was considered improper for them to look at nude models of either sex).

If you also look in the VF “boy” catalog, they also feature the same drawing set. Hmmm…art sets are something unisex? And (tongue in cheek) isn’t the idea of unisex anything considered anathema to patriocentric circles?

  RichardD wrote @

Cindy – I noticed what you’re describing about the degree of femininity in patriarchist men in the photo of that young girl who runs a pro-patriarchy blog. The name of her blog was By His Grace – For His Glory (I only remember it because that’s also the name of my blog … hmmph!) She was pictured with her father in the side bar and her father looked extremely effeminate. He also gave an impression in the way he was standing with her that didn’t sit well with me. It struck me as very odd and I couldn’t put my finger on it until I read your comment.

Thatmom – My father is a rabid sports nut. He loves all sports and is even willing to stay up late at night in order to catch a bochi ball or ping-pong tournaments on ESPN. He really wanted a sport-junkie son as well. But he got me.

My interests were always “girlie.” I like design, I’m a musician, I enjoy cooking. But my father was man enough to accept me as I was and not make judments against me because my bent is different than his. He (and my mom) encouraged me to pursue a career in music. I followed that path but found that it wasn’t what I wanted. I floundered about for a bit until God led me down a very defined path toward graphic design. And I love what I do for a living. And my parents seem to be very proud of me.

I can see how pushing me away from these natural inclinations (not sinful, which should be avoided, but simply different than my dad’s) could have cemented in my mind the idea that what I enjoyed was “girl stuff” and made me confused about gender issues. He did not and although I type well and am concerned with compositional balance, no one ever confuses me for a woman. Not even when I cook quiche.

  thatmom wrote @

Cindy, I have often wondered the same thing.

  thatmom wrote @

Queen of Cheese,

The same was also true in the field of music. It used to be considered a shame for women to play the piano. Now some people even frown on boys taking music lessons.

  thatmom wrote @

Richard, I am so glad that you commented about this. And three cheers for your mom and dad. Are you an only child, Richard?

  Corrie wrote @

“First, the absence of biblical patriarchy leads to male effeminacy which leads to homosexuality. Biblical patriarchy must be re-established within the home. To the extent that families have embraced evolutionary or feminist principles of family life (be that the birth control ethic, the effeminate “career wife” model of household provision, or the Greco-Roman vision for educating children) they must repent and return to the “old paths.””

Will they never grow tired of this sad excuse?

Sodom???? Gemorrha???? Rome???? Greece????? Europe????? Israel, right amongs the tribe of Benjamin???

All throughout the ages, homosexuality has flourished in PATRIARCHAL cultures. In fact, patriarchal philosophers used to wax eloquent about how much more wonderful it was to have sex with another man but women were necessary for procreation, so they recommended taking a male lover on the side.

Making being male an idol is what leads to homosexuality, imho. And Cindy is correct- if patriarchy is the cure for effeminate men, then why are there so many effeminate men in patriarchy?

Patriarchy is not the cure for homosexuality, that is a false assertion as history proves.

Right now, in the Middle East, among the most patriarchal men the world knows, having young male lovers is in vogue. They have parties where young men dance for them and later have sex with these young men (even boys).

What are the “old paths”? Judges 19? Genesis 19? Romans 1? The context of all of these cultures was patriarchy. Funny, huh?

Homosexuality is NOT cured by getting married, wife staying at home, man as boss, woman as subservient to a man’s needs and the two having as many children as possible.

Perversion of any kind is alive and well in patriarchal marriages as well as in non-patriarchal marriages.

They are only fooling themselves.

  Corrie wrote @

Wasn’t the first man, Adam, a florist? :-)

I mean, he lived in perfection, no thorns or thistles or any work to be done by the sweat of his brow. All he had to do is enjoy God’s creation, really, and maybe create some fabulous floral arrangements.

  Kathleen or Kate, for short wrote @

Karen and everyone,

Thank you for this discussion. :)

  Cindy K wrote @

Corrie wrote: And Cindy is correct- if patriarchy is the cure for effeminate men, then why are there so many effeminate men in patriarchy?

Corrie,

Did you get me mixed up with Doug Phillips?

I thought I made this same case based upon the idolatry issues told to us in Romans 1. Idolatry in that chapter are very close in nature and idolatry of the creature can be considered a consequence of God’s giving the idolatrous man over to that which he desires — until it comes out of his nostrils in an ironic twist on man’s perversion.

It was back on the great divide thread late April/Early June.

Patriarchy is the idolatry of the worship of the male creature over the Creator and I think that we have some good Biblical precedent that indicates that this idolatry will degrade into homosexuality. They are ironically getting just what they seek as they are given over unto their own lusts.

  penelope wrote @

Wow. As a single woman (age 30) who grew up (much to her parents’ chagrin) a very non-domesticated tomboy, and who is now living under a degree of censure for her independent ‘feminist’ ways, this article was a breath of fresh air. It is SO difficult to live as a single woman under the church’s paradigm of ‘militant fecundity’, etc etc. Even when I point out, as Paul did, that as a single I am free to serve the Lord in ways I could not if I had a husband/family in which to focus my attention!
In the last judgment, the Lord will not say to me, “Well done, thou good and faithful servant, thou got married and had sixteen children.” Yet, for views such as this, we are censured for not fulfilling the creational mandate to be fruitful. Praise the Lord that my value as a woman is not in what I have done (or not done), and instead found in Christ’s work alone.
PS ever notice that the greatest chefs are often men as well?

  thatmom wrote @

Hi Penelope…I love your name, it is my oldest grand-daughter’s name, too.

I am glad you have joined the discussion! Please continue.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.